[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
At 12:22 PM 12/1/99 -0800, Ron Daniel wrote: >and here is my attempt to give an example of why RDF >is useful: Very good, Ron. Well said. And here is my attempt to explain why RDF hasn't been more successful: The syntax is hideously ugly and hard to understand, and the spec worries so hard about being correct and complete that it is pretty well 100% incomprehensible to ordinary people. I probably just hurt some feelings, but I've already shouted this in private enough times that it won't be a surprise. In my opinion RDF needs some serious sugar-coating and tutorializing if it is ever going to achieve its potential. I think its potential is huge, dwarfing that of XML. -Tim xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|

Cart



