• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: 20 Nov 1999 08:14:08 -0500

Sean McGrath <digitome@i...> writes:

> Any SML doc is an XML doc but not the other way around.
> 
> 	SML < XML < SGML

That gets you into the subset dilemma: all conformant XML processors
will be able to handle SML, but not all conformant SML processors will
be able to handle XML.

Perhaps it's worth the cost, and perhaps not -- that's up to you guys
(and, eventually, the market) to decide -- but there *is* a cost.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: SGML, XML and SML
    • From: "Julian Reschke" <reschke@m...>

• References:
  • Re: SGML, XML and SML
    • From: Sean McGrath <digitome@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: SGML, XML and SML
• Next by Date: RE: SGML, XML and SML
• Previous by thread: Re: SGML, XML and SML
• Next by thread: RE: SGML, XML and SML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread