• From: Sean McGrath <digitome@i...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Sat, 20 Nov 1999 11:15:38 +0000

At 07:35 PM 11/20/99 +0800, you wrote:
> From: Don Park <donpark@d...>
>
> >
>>FYI, SML does not have the three problems.  It is just hairless XML.
>
>Well, it is not XML at all if  it miss-parses a well-formed XML
>document.
>
Ah, but as I understand it (correct me if I'm wrong SML guys),
the idea is to make SML an "application profile" of XML 1.0.

Any SML doc is an XML doc but not the other way around.

	SML < XML < SGML


regards,

<Sean uri="http://www.digitome.com/sean.html">
Developers Day co-Chair WWW9, April 2000, Amsterdam
<uri>http://www.www9.org</uri>
</Sean>



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: SGML, XML and SML
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• References:
  • Re: SGML, XML and SML
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Feeling good about SML
• Next by Date: RE: SGML, XML and SML
• Previous by thread: Re: SGML, XML and SML
• Next by thread: Re: SGML, XML and SML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread