• From: Mark Nutter <mnutter@f...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Mon, 01 Nov 1999 16:58:49 -0500

At 01:33 PM 11/01/99 -0800, Andrew Layman wrote:
>Would you seriously like me to go on a campaign to change this?  I 
>can.  But
>before you say "yes," though, please make sure that you have a settled,
>detailed technical proposal that you are all happy with, is tested, and 
>that
>is agreed on by the relevant W3C activities.  If you do that, I will be
>happy to ask to have the behavior changed.

Just curious:  Does this mean that the current behavior is the result of a 
detailed technical proposal that all XML developers are happy with, and 
that was tested, and that has been agreed to by the relevant W3C 
activities?

-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-

Mark Nutter, <mnutter@f...>
Internet Applications Developer
FORE Systems
"I'm not an actor, but I play one on TV..."


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • RE: Undeclared namespace
    • From: Andrew Layman <andrewl@m...>

• Prev by Date: XML Client detection
• Next by Date: Re: A Plea for Schemas
• Previous by thread: RE: Undeclared namespace
• Next by thread: Re: Undeclared namespace
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread