• From: "Don Park" <donpark@d...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sat, 27 Nov 1999 06:07:17 -0800

>Since you are not asking for use-cases, the only logic
>driving SML is reductionism. The result can only
>be a language with 1 encoding and 1 tag and the 
>minimum repertoire for names.
>
>SML = (data | "<" ASCII* ">" SML "<" ASCII* ">"  )*
>
>Given this, discussion seems utterly futile.

Rick,

You logic escapes me and I am afraid your next
deduction will be that I do not exist.  Please
allow me to have a say in what I say.  Also,
allow me to point out that taking part in a
futile discussion is, well, futile.

Since both of us seem to be rather emotionally
charged, I declare that my previous paragraph
was in jest and not in spite.

Best,

Don Park    -   mailto:donpark@d...
Docuverse   -   http://www.docuverse.com


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • #2 Re: [SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: RE: [SML] Internationalization. (Preliminary EBNF for SML)
• Next by Date: Why no ']]>' in CharData?
• Previous by thread: #2 Re: [SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?
• Next by thread: Use cases for XML failure (was Re: #2 Re: [SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread