• From: "Don Park" <donpark@d...>
• To: "'XML Dev'" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 12:36:30 -0800

>So, what is missing is the notion of "aggregation" and the 
>notion of "scope of rendition". This could promote re-use
>and modularity.

Bingo.  My, previously unstated, thinking is that certain
design choices made at syntax level can encourage this line
of thinking.  If people can only create modules, they will
have to create modules. <g>

As far as the question "What is a document?" is concerned,
my view is that a document is an end-product and thus has a
sense of wholeness which runs counter to the ideals of
reusability and modularity.

Best,

Don Park    -   mailto:donpark@d...
Docuverse   -   http://www.docuverse.com


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • RE: What is a document?
    • From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>

• Prev by Date: RE: SGML, XML and SML
• Next by Date: Re: Grafting DOM on a C++ XML parser?
• Previous by thread: RE: What is a document?
• Next by thread: RE: What is a document?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread