• From: "Don Park" <donpark@d...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 11:54:12 -0800

Tim Bray wrote:
>And SML must not claim, explicitly or implicitly, to "be XML".

I think this condition can be met.  We will make it clear that:

SML is a subset of XML and is not to be considered, in any sense,
as conforming to the full XML 1.0 specification.

If you have better wordings, I'll be obliged.  It is not my
intention to sabotage XML in-flight.

Best,

Don Park    -   mailto:donpark@d...
Docuverse   -   http://www.docuverse.com


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: SGML, XML and SML
    • From: Paul Tchistopolskii <paul@q...>

• References:
  • Re: SGML, XML and SML
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: RE: SGML, XML and SML
• Next by Date: RE: What is a document?
• Previous by thread: Re: SGML, XML and SML
• Next by thread: Re: SGML, XML and SML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread