• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Tue, 14 Sep 1999 12:54:07 -0400

At 09:06 AM 9/14/99 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
>http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-118105.html?tag=st.ne.1005.thed.1005-2
00-118105

A remarkable story, indeed, and generally excellent.

My favorite line has to be:
>W3C representatives characterized the contentious debate over 
>XHTML namespaces as a normal part of the W3C review process.

Very nice bit of spin, that is, thereby avoiding the unexplored political
end of the story.  XHTML is controversial, but the W3C is still happily in
charge.

Simon St.Laurent
XML: A Primer (2nd Ed - September)
Building XML Applications
Inside XML DTDs: Scientific and Technical
Sharing Bandwidth / Cookies
http://www.simonstl.com

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • CNET on XHTML
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: CNET on XHTML
• Next by Date: Re: Extenders (BNF rule 89)
• Previous by thread: Re: CNET on XHTML
• Next by thread: RE: CNET on XHTML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread