• From: "Don Park" <donpark@d...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Tue, 14 Sep 1999 13:35:37 -0700

The article was updated with Ann's comment added so it is more balanced now
although the result is the same: there is trouble brewing for W3C.  Since I
am fairly certain that W3C will ignore all the arguments and concerns raised
against three namespaces, I believe the divide between W3C and XML-DEV will
continue to widen.

I wonder why the SOAP spec was submitted to IETF rather than W3C?  A new
trend of sort?

Don Park    -   mailto:donpark@d...
Docuverse   -   http://www.docuverse.com


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: CNET on XHTML
    • From: Daniel Veillard <Daniel.Veillard@w...>

• References:
  • CNET on XHTML
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>

• Prev by Date: ANN: Oracle XML Parser for Java v2.0.2 - Production Release
• Next by Date: Open Forum on Metadata Registries: CFParticipation
• Previous by thread: Re: CNET on XHTML
• Next by thread: Re: CNET on XHTML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread