• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• To: XML-Dev Mailing list <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sun, 19 Sep 1999 20:12:08 -0400 (EDT)

schen@f... writes:

 > Not all platforms have stable 1.2 support yet, in fact the only two
 > platforms that seem to be ok are Windows and Solaris, with Sun's
 > JVM.

JDK 1.2 behaves very well on Linux as well, at least as far as I've
pushed it over the past few months.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: should FOP require JDK1.2.x?
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>

• References:
  • should FOP require JDK1.2.x?
    • From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@j...>
  • Re: should FOP require JDK1.2.x?
    • From: <schen@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: W3C and 'small vendors'.
• Next by Date: Re xml-dev Digest V1 #348
• Previous by thread: RE: should FOP require JDK1.2.x?
• Next by thread: Re: should FOP require JDK1.2.x?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread