• From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@j...>
• To: "XML-Dev Mailing list" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sun, 19 Sep 1999 09:21:21 +0800

I'd be interested in hearing people's views on the simple question: should
FOP (my XSL formatter/renderer) require JDK1.2.x? At present it works with
1.1.x.

What are other XML developers doing? Should I stick to 1.1.x compatibility?
Or can I require 1.2.x without offending too many people?

James
--
James Tauber / jtauber@j... / www.jtauber.com
Maintainer of : www.xmlinfo.com,  www.xmlsoftware.com and www.schema.net
<pipe>Ceci n'est pas une pipe</pipe>





xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: should FOP require JDK1.2.x?
    • From: <schen@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Signifiers/Namespaces (was Re: Another look at namespaces)
• Next by Date: Re: Another look at namespaces
• Previous by thread: W3C and 'small vendors'.
• Next by thread: Re: should FOP require JDK1.2.x?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread