• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 21:32:27 -0400 (EDT)

Michele Lee writes:

 > I'm trying to decide which XML C/C++ parser to use.  Is there any
 > comparison available?  In particular, comparison between IBM4C++
 > and expat.

Expat is small, fast, and stable -- it's getting a very heavy workout
in the Perl community (where it's the standard Perl XML parser), so
serious bugs tend to have been chased down, and it seems to operate
practically at I/O speed.

On the downside, Expat is C rather than C++, so the interface is a
little messy -- you might want to put together a C++ wrapper to help
avoid nastier bugs.

I have no experience yet with IBM4C++, but I do know that they have an 
interface based on SAX as well as the DOM.  It's very new, so expect
bugs.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • comparison between XML C/C++ parsers?
    • From: Michele Lee <mclee@o...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML vs. object model resource usage for manipulation
• Next by Date: XML Parser
• Previous by thread: comparison between XML C/C++ parsers?
• Next by thread: RE: comparison between XML C/C++ parsers?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread