• From: "F.A.A." <l-arcini@u...>
• To: "Michele Lee" <mclee@o...>, <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 05:24:27 -0500

- I'm trying to decide which XML C/C++ parser to use.  Is there any
- comparison
- available?  In particular, comparison between IBM4C++ and expat.

Just wanted to add 3 things to mr. David Megginson's reply:

1.A very useful c++ wrapper was posted to the list a couple of months ago by
Andy Dent. Just check the list archives or send me an email.

2.I have used them both on diferent versions of a project and I've found
expat (using Andy's expatpp) a better choice because of stability (David is
right: expect a few problems with IBM4C2), portability, and speed. Besides,
on a personal note, my development time with expat was considerably smaller
(about 10% less; note that i first used expat, so i had some experience with
a parser when i tackled xml4c++).

3.A few weeks ago www.XML.com published a comparision of parsers, you may
want to take a look there.

Live long,

	Fabio
- thanks!
-
- --Michele


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • comparison between XML C/C++ parsers?
    • From: Michele Lee <mclee@o...>

• Prev by Date: Notations in the external Subset
• Next by Date: Re: Notations in the external Subset
• Previous by thread: re: comparison between XML C/C++ parsers?
• Next by thread: Re: comparison between XML C/C++ parsers?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread