• From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 14:12:36 -0400 (EDT)

Ronald Bourret scripsit:

> However, this doesn't take into account the case you show. My best guess is 
> that we simply didn't think of it.

I second that.   We didn't think of it.

-- 
John Cowan                                   cowan@c...
       I am a member of a civilization. --David Brin

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • RE: DDML Section 2.3.7: Nested SEQs within SEQ
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rbourret@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: parsers for Palm?
• Next by Date: Validation and Parser Bloat (was: Re: parsers for Palm?)
• Previous by thread: RE: DDML Section 2.3.7: Nested SEQs within SEQ
• Next by thread: XML 'at fly'
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread