• From: "Don Park" <donpark@q...>
• To: "'XML-Dev Mailing list'" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 09:52:32 -0700

> Certification really only tests whether an appliction
> produces valid XML
> in a particular situation. If 3COM is going to get "into" XML
> they might
> as well embed a validating parser into the ROM.

What about the new XML Schema spec (which raises the complexity quite a bit
over DTD) in the pipeline?  Has anyone eyeballed the likely size of the
parser for new XML Schema?

As far as certification process goes, it is fairly straight forward (at
least for Java) to write a harness that analysize the code (XLint?) to make
sure it generates valid XML.

Best,

Don Park
Docuverse


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: parsers for Palm?
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• References:
  • Re: parsers for Palm?
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML Editors - Word 2000??
• Next by Date: Re: DDML Section 2.3.7: Nested SEQs within SEQ
• Previous by thread: Re: parsers for Palm?
• Next by thread: Re: parsers for Palm?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread