[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@j...>
  • To: "Carl Hage" <carl@c...>, <xml-dev@i...>
  • Date: Tue, 1 Jun 1999 07:40:10 +0800

> Turn it around-- it would be intrinsically <em>good</em> to require
> all namespaces to reference a retrievable document.

But this is what started my whole point. How do you distinguish the "thing"
from the "retrievable document"? It isn't so much a problem with namespaces
because the "Creator" of a namespace is pretty much going to be the
"Creator" of the descriptive document.But consider your example of using:

http://isbn.org/isbn/1-57595-180-0B

to refer to a book *and* to the MARC record. The "Creator" of the book is
the author but the "Creator" of the MARC record probably someone else. But
THEY HAVE THE SAME URL!

James


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)



Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member