• From: Miles Sabin <msabin@c...>
• To: 'XML Dev' <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 12:01:21 +0100

David Megginson wrote,
> That's the main reason for the shift to 
> get/setFeature/Property -- while it screws around with 
> type safety a little, it should eliminate (most) of 
> the need for subclassing Parser2 any further.

Yes, but these new methods are a natural extension of
the *core* functionality of the Parser interface. As 
such I'm with John Cowan that they should be merged into
Parser.

Cheers,


Miles

-- 
Miles Sabin                          Cromwell Media
Internet Systems Architect           5/6 Glenthorne Mews
+44 (0)181 410 2230                  London, W6 0LJ
msabin@c...           England

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: RE: Parser2 considered harmful
• Next by Date: No Subject
• Previous by thread: RE: Parser2 considered harmful
• Next by thread: RE: Parser2 considered harmful
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread