• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• To: "'XML Dev'" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 09:28:18 -0400 (EDT)

Miles Sabin writes:

 > It's not diamond inheritance per-se which is the
 > problem, it's (as you point out) the potential for a
 > combinatorial explosion of derived interfaces which is
 > nasty.

Some concrete examples might be helpful -- I know that the
get/setFeature/Property methods in Parser2 are not a silver bullet,
but under what circumstances might people want to subclass Parser2
further in the future?


Thanks, and all the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • RE: Parser2 considered harmful
    • From: Miles Sabin <msabin@c...>

• Prev by Date: Arguments to XMLTest.java
• Next by Date: No Subject
• Previous by thread: RE: Parser2 considered harmful
• Next by thread: RE: Parser2 considered harmful
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread