• From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@j...>
• To: "XML Dev" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 3 May 1999 22:56:57 +0800

> > In the first case I define an attribute xml:link to have a CDATA type
> > that is fixed at the value "simple".  In the second case I define an
> > attribute xml:link to have an enumeration type with one possible value,
> > and it defaults to that one value.  Seems to me like these definitions
> > are semantically equivalent. Yes?  /Roger
>
> In this case, yes; in general, no, because enumerated values must
> be nmtokens, whereas a CDATA FIXED attribute can have any value,
> like an URL.

And whitespace normalisation is different, too.

<foo xml:link="simple"> and <foo xml:link="       simple          "> will
only be treated as the same in the case of the enum.

James


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Difference between a FIXED attribute vs enum with one value?
    • From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@m...>
  • Re: Difference between a FIXED attribute vs enum with one value?
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>

• Prev by Date: RE: intercepting internal entities?
• Next by Date: Example of using conditional sections?
• Previous by thread: Re: Difference between a FIXED attribute vs enum with one value?
• Next by thread: Example of using conditional sections?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread