• From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Mon, 8 Feb 1999 16:52:15 -0500 (EST)

Rob Schoening scripsit:

>   XML has nothing of the kind.  I hate to sound pessimistic, but if things
> are left to evolve this way, XML is going to become just another
> open-standard *file format*.  

Yes.  That's what it is!  That's *exactly* what XML is!

-- 
John Cowan					cowan@c...
		e'osai ko sarji la lojban.

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces
    • From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@m...>

• References:
  • RE: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces
    • From: Rob Schoening <rschoening@u...>

• Prev by Date: XML-RPC & HTTP-NG (was A critique of XML-RPC)
• Next by Date: RE: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces
• Previous by thread: RE: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces
• Next by thread: Re: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread