• From: "Ingargiola, Tito" <ti64877@i...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Mon, 8 Feb 1999 11:22:37 -0500

Hi,

XML-RPC sounds nice to me: simple, light-weight and immediately applicable
to a good set of problems.  I looked over some of the w3's pages on HTTP-NG,
however, and it looks like there's a good deal of overlapping functionality
between these two proposed standards.  Why is this, and what's the intended
relation between the two (if any?)  Are you investigating HTTP-NG support in
Frontier?  Thanks for any insights.  Regards,

	Tito.




xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: RE: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces
• Next by Date: Re: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces
• Previous by thread: an initial idea for an XML überdocument shell (was Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS?)
• Next by thread: RE: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread