• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: David LeBlanc <whisper@a...>, <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sun, 17 Jan 1999 09:16:10 -0800

At 09:42 PM 1/16/99 -0800, David LeBlanc wrote:
>Are these going to be complimentary or is one of them going to supplement
>eiither  or both of the others?

At the moment, only DTD has any official standing.  All those other 
things are submissions and proposals; the W3C has a process under way
to sort them all out and propose a next-gen schema facility. -Tim

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: DTD vs DCD vs Schema
    • From: David LeBlanc <whisper@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML - NG
• Next by Date: Re: XML Component API
• Previous by thread: DTD vs DCD vs Schema
• Next by thread: Re: DTD vs DCD vs Schema
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread