• From: David LeBlanc <whisper@a...>
• To: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>, <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sun, 17 Jan 1999 11:36:16 -0800

Hi Tim;
Thank you for your response.

I understand that only DTDs have official standing and that DCD and XSchema
(and others) are only submissions/proposals to W3C. What i'm asking, is it
the intent that, in the fullness of time, one of these will supplant DTDs
as a document type notation?

Sincerely,

Dave LeBlanc

At 09:16 AM 1/17/99 -0800, Tim Bray wrote:
>At 09:42 PM 1/16/99 -0800, David LeBlanc wrote:
>>Are these going to be complimentary or is one of them going to supplement
>>eiither  or both of the others?
>
>At the moment, only DTD has any official standing.  All those other 
>things are submissions and proposals; the W3C has a process under way
>to sort them all out and propose a next-gen schema facility. -Tim
>
>

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: DTD vs DCD vs Schema
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Re: DTD vs DCD vs Schema
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: specs for Coins 3.1 ?
• Next by Date: Re: DTD vs DCD vs Schema
• Previous by thread: Re: DTD vs DCD vs Schema
• Next by thread: Re: DTD vs DCD vs Schema
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread