• From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 13:12:20 -0500

Ronald Bourret wrote:

> I think you do need to create a new namespace for these.  Each would give
> you multiple definitions of the same variable within the same namespace,
> which makes no more sense for XML than it does for a programming language.

I don't agree with you, at least taking "namespace" in the sense of
the Rec.  Namespaces are just lists of names (one for elements,
one for global attributes, one for each element containing its
local attributes).

Nothing can be inferred about the proper use of a name from the
mere fact of its appearance in a namespace.

-- 
John Cowan	http://www.ccil.org/~cowan		cowan@c...
	You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
	You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
		Clear all so!  'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • RE: What is a namespace ... really?
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rbourret@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: What is a namespace ... really?
• Next by Date: Namespace PR
• Previous by thread: RE: What is a namespace ... really?
• Next by thread: re: What is a namespace ... really?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread