Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
David Megginson wrote: > What if I want to create a schema specifying that (for my set of > documents) an html:p element may contain a tei:foreign element, or a > docbook:Trademark element in addition to the regular HTML elements? > > What if I want to create a schema specifying that (for my set of > documents) an html:p element may *not* contain an html:font element? > > It doesn't make sense to have to create a new and different namespace > for either of these -- I'm still using the individual elements in > mostly the same way. I think you do need to create a new namespace for these. Each would give you multiple definitions of the same variable within the same namespace, which makes no more sense for XML than it does for a programming language. Note that an inheritance scheme might work, but the new element would exist in your namespace, not the one the supertype inhabits. -- Ron Bourret xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
