Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
i suspect i stand in a (very small) minority on this issue, but with respect to the diagram (http://www.simonstl.com/articles/layering/layered2.gif.) the "namespace transformation" should appear at least above "attribute defaulting". i fear i stand in an even smaller minority on the second claim - that it belongs above entity resolution. perhaps not in the current spec, but time will tell. Simon St.Laurent wrote: > ... > > For a discussion of how this might work, see my rough essay "Toward A > Layered Model for XML", available at > http://www.simonstl.com/articles/layering/layered.htm. If you just want a > quick look at a picture that adds namespace support to a possible set of > layered event-based processes, see xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
