• From: Paul Prescod <papresco@t...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 18:19:35 -0400

Richard Emberson wrote:
> 
> Does the XML processor actually check for this Validity Constraint
> violation before normalization?

Yes, I think so. The "checked for validity" that 3.3.3. discusses is
"checked for conformance to its DTD." 3.3.3. could be more explicit. (the
W3C doesn't really seem to have a mechanism for minor patches to its
specs...does it?)

 Paul Prescod  - http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco

It's such a 
Bore
Being always
Poor
LANGSTON HUGHES
http://www.northshore.net/homepages/hope/engHughes.html

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • REC-xml-19980210: normalized attribute values
    • From: emberson@f... (Richard Emberson)

• Prev by Date: REC-xml-19980210 Concerning validation, in section 3
• Next by Date: Re: REC-xml-19980210 unparsed entity
• Previous by thread: REC-xml-19980210: normalized attribute values
• Next by thread: Re: REC-xml-19980210: normalized attribute values
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread