• From: Alex.Thomas@d...
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1998 19:32:54 +0100

Yes indeed, I don't think this is widely appreciated for some reason, though
I think the hybrid approach you refer to might actually be the most common
case (Java with a DCD).

Like many investment firms, we make use of multicast publish-subscribe and
message queue transports. Not all our recipients will be Java, hence the
attraction of one message for all.

cheers
Alex

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Brownell [mailto:db@E...]
...
> If one assumes Java,
> then DCD tagging isn't needed:
> 
> 	<com.example.foo.SimpleBean>
> 		<prop1>49</prop1>
> 		<prop2>hello world</prop1>
> 		</com.sun.example.foo.SimpleBean>
> 
> since all the type info is in the class for SimpleBean!  
...

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: Ownership of Names (was Re: Public identifiers and topic maps)
• Next by Date: Re: XML [~serialization] and Objects
• Previous by thread: DCD: namespaces in element and attribute references
• Next by thread: Re: XML [~serialization] and Objects
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread