• From: David Brownell <db@E...>
• To: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1998 11:18:25 -0700

John Cowan wrote:
> 
> Michael Kay wrote:
> 
> > **There is no global namespace**
> 
> Maybe not.  But the set of namespaces had better be strongly
> connected, or we're going to have trouble referring from over
> *here* to over *there*.

Sometimes such references are non-goals ... 

> (What would a namespace not strongly connected to the rest
> be like?  Sort of like colors of the ultraviolet?)

... like when you set up an isolated network with its own DNS
root server and hierarchy, to test a network configuration
with new software that you dare not let out.  Hmm, virus tests
in a Class IV containment environment?  UV decontamination
may not be good enough!  ;-)

Seriously -- don't assume connectivity is always a goal.

- Dave

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: Ownership of Names (was Re: Public identifiers and topic maps)
    • From: "Michael Kay" <M.H.Kay@e...>
  • Re: Ownership of Names (was Re: Public identifiers and topic maps)
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML [~serialization] and Objects
• Next by Date: RE: XML [~serialization] and Objects
• Previous by thread: Re: Ownership of Names (was Re: Public identifiers and topic maps)
• Next by thread: Re: Ownership of Names (was Re: Public identifiers and topic maps)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread