• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: "'Xml-Dev (E-mail)'" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 05 Aug 1998 08:00:11 -0700

At 10:46 AM 8/5/98 -0400, Sam Gentile wrote:
>Will I be better off having my code
>"spawn" an existing parser instead of integrating with this source code? Can
>Validating parsers be used even when DTDs are not used (like Microsoft's and
>IBM's)?

Well, Lark, XP, et al manifest as Java classes and in most cases you
do a "new Parser" or some such constructor... is that what you mean
by "spawn"?  Also, have a look at sax (www.megginson.com) -Tim

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: Namespaces and URNs
• Next by Date: Help in picking a parser
• Previous by thread: Re: Namespace Comments (and dtd encoding)
• Next by thread: RE: Help in picking a parser
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread