• From: "Sam Gentile" <samg@f...>
• To: "'David Brownell'" <db@E...>,"'XML Dev'" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 5 Aug 1998 12:00:23 -0400

I don't have a month. I have a day. Our team leader has resolved it - use
Microsoft's Java classes to do it on both ends.

-----Original Message-----
From: David Brownell [mailto:db@E...]
Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 1998 11:51 AM
To: Sam Gentile
Subject: Re: Help in picking a parser


Particularly if you'll be using Java, you should look at the
package Sun will be providing.  It's not yet on the web, but
should be there later this month.  Includes validating and
nonvalidating parsers ... very fast, robust, conformant.

Alternatively, I usually recomment XP.  It has that same
set of technical advantages, though it doesn't offer any
validation option and is "just a parser".

- Dave



Sam Gentile wrote:
>
> I am working on a E-Commerce Banking system and we have finally convinced
> people to use XML to transport our data from the browser front-end to the
> Web Server and out through our TUXEDO application servers. There is a need
> for XM parsers in several locations. On the browser side, we have DHTML
and
> Microsoft's Visual J++ WFC "Code Behind DHTML" Java classes. I thought
there
> was a WFC class to do parsing but it turns out that there is  a
> com.ms.xml.parser in the Java SDK. So that side is taken care of.
>
> Our problem is more on the Web Server side. On the client, we are
streaming
> the Java classes into an XML buffer to go to the Web server. The Web
server
> will need to parse this XML and use a factory to dynamically instantiate
and
> re-create the Java class hierarchy.
> Then the data will be put in TUXEDO FML format for shipment to the Tuxedo
> servers. On the way back, I will have to take an FML buffer and convert to
> an XML buffer.
> They say they don't want to use DTDs and validating parsers and that we
may
> need the parser to be cross-platform. So I have been looking at
> Nonvalidating parsers like Lark and XP. I am new to XML. It seems like
these
> parsers are a maze of source code. Will I be better off having my code
> "spawn" an existing parser instead of integrating with this source code?
Can
> Validating parsers be used even when DTDs are not used (like Microsoft's
and
> IBM's)?
>
> Any suggestions and thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Sam Gentile
> Senior Software Engineer
> Fundtech Corporation
> samg@f... <mailto:samg@f...>
>
>
> xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
> Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
> To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
> (un)subscribe xml-dev
> To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following
message;
> subscribe xml-dev-digest
> List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: Deterministic behavior in processors
• Next by Date: Re:
• Previous by thread: Re: Help in picking a parser
• Next by thread: Name spaces and URNs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread