• From: Dan Brickley <Daniel.Brickley@b...>
• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1998 17:19:31 +0100 (BST)

On Mon, 17 Aug 1998, John Cowan wrote:

> > www.w3c.org is starting to look like Schema-of-the-Month Club.
> 
> The stuff they're publishing is Notes, which means "neat ideas by
> members; W3C doesn't endorse them in any way."

It's not all member submission Notes...

eg. http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-rdf-schema/ (new version as of last week)

...is the result of a W3C working group for RDF Schemas. 
It addresses some but not yet all of the issues in the TimBL/DanC paper
and looks, from where I'm standing, to be pretty complimentary to the
ideas behind the DCD submission.

> > I am confused about where things are going.
> 
> So say we all (except perhaps people who are constrained by W3C
> confidentiality from saying anything).

The nearest I've found to something looking remotely like a master plan
is the publically available overview note at http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-rdfarch

Dan



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: More on Namespaces (also long, but also optimistic)
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>

• Prev by Date: a small question on xml
• Next by Date: Re: a small question on xml
• Previous by thread: Re: More on Namespaces (also long, but also optimistic)
• Next by thread: Re: More on Namespaces (also long, but also optimistic)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread