Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Charles Reitzel wrote: > o Namespaces Because the development of XML-related standards isn't open (you gotta pay $$$$ to play), nobody's likely to listen to your idea, which is essentially that of the (current - 1)th namespace draft. > o Expanded Names > > The issue of expanded names reminds me a great deal of C++ name mangling. > The C++ committee chose not to standardize mangled names. Consequently, it > is impossible to link libraries compiled by different libraries. That was intentional, since different compilers use different callling conventions anyhow. > As an aside, the stylesheet processor might want to match by prefix, which > would insulate documents from changes in the namespace ID, which might > change to reflect DTD version changes. Maybe so. > www.w3c.org is starting to look like Schema-of-the-Month Club. The stuff they're publishing is Notes, which means "neat ideas by members; W3C doesn't endorse them in any way." > I am > confused about where things are going. So say we all (except perhaps people who are constrained by W3C confidentiality from saying anything). -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@c... You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn. You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn. Clear all so! 'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5) xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
