• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <SimonStL@c...>
• To: "XML Dev" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Thu, 4 Jun 98 22:05:47 UT

>Hmmm.  This sounds like the "root" (my syntax) or "RootElement" (Ron's
>syntax) attribute in XSchema is a Bad Thing.  Perhaps it should be
>removed?

Given the current way DOCTYPEs work, as well as the desire voiced by many on 
this list to be able to validate fragments, we'd probably do better to leave 
roots out of it.  It remains an important issue, however, for whatever we use 
to link an XSchema to a document.  Do we need/want to declare a 'Root' element 
there?

It seems to me it could be optional, provided that whatever authors choose as 
their root contains the content model specified for it by the schema.  This is 
an issue we need to address.

Simon St.Laurent
Dynamic HTML: A Primer / XML: A Primer / Cookies


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: Roots of the DTD (was: ANNOUNCE: Virtual Hyperglossary)
• Next by Date: Re: OK, I've read some books, tons of articles, and...
• Previous by thread: Re: New Kid on the block...
• Next by thread: New Kid on the block... (block=XML)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread