[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>
  • To: XML Dev <xml-dev@i...>
  • Date: Thu, 04 Jun 1998 22:43:40

At 17:27 04/06/98 -0400, John Cowan wrote:
>
>Hmmm.  This sounds like the "root" (my syntax) or "RootElement" (Ron's
>syntax) attribute in XSchema is a Bad Thing.  Perhaps it should be
>removed?
>
Yup :-). I have not commented on the current proposals because I wanted
them to anneal before public comment. *For describing a DTD*, here should
be no requirement to define a <root> of any sort, only <element>,
<attribute>, <contentSpec> and possibly <entity> and <notation> according
to how people think.  
Of course if you wish to propose a <root> element to extend the
functionality you may, but I (and I expect many others) will urge you to
remove it :-)

	P.

(Of course the XSchema **as an XML document** must have exactly one root
element, but it will probably be called something like <XSC:XSchema>)

Peter Murray-Rust, Director Virtual School of Molecular Sciences, domestic
net connection
VSMS http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/vsms, Virtual Hyperglossary
http://www.venus.co.uk/vhg

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member