• From: Paul Prescod <papresco@t...>
• To: "Xml-Dev (E-mail)" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Fri, 29 May 1998 17:09:31 -0400

Peter Murray-Rust wrote:
> 
> Later on 'documents' is used to represent both XSchema documents and
> document instances. Would 'XSchemas' be a useful shorthand for 'XSchema
> documents'?

The question is: what is the pluaral of XSchema? We invented the word and
can thus decide. Do we go with backwards-compatibility (XSchemata) or
simplicity (XSchemas)?

 Paul Prescod  - http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco

Three things see no end: A loop with exit code done wrong
A semaphore untested, and the change that comes along
http://www.geezjan.org/humor/computers/threes.html

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: XSchema: Goals, final version
    • From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>

• Prev by Date: What are schemata
• Next by Date: Re: XSD: RDF and XSchema
• Previous by thread: Re: XSchema: Goals, final version
• Next by thread: Re: XSchema: Goals, final version
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread