• From: Paul Prescod <papresco@t...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Fri, 29 May 1998 16:39:02 -0400

Tim Bray wrote:
> 
> I kind of think that the thing people have in mind in this group when
> they say "schema" is "expressions of syntactic constraints which can
> be verified mechanically" or some such.  

I would take out the word "syntactic." Databse schemata have much more
than syntactic constraints. Arguably, so do document schemata. Is IDREF 
a syntactic constraint? Not according to my intuition.

 Paul Prescod  - http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco

Three things never trust in: That's the vendor's final bill
The promises your boss makes, and the customer's good will 
http://www.geezjan.org/humor/computers/threes.html



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: What are schemata
    • From: "James K. Tauber" <jtauber@j...>

• References:
  • RE: XSD: Proposed Goals, Rev. 3
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: RDF and XLink
• Next by Date: Re: XSchema: Goals, final version
• Previous by thread: RE: XSD: Proposed Goals, Rev. 3
• Next by thread: RE: What are schemata
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread