Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Lisa Rein wrote:
> > An XML DTD in current DTD syntax doesn't need a new name at all,
> > of course -- XML DTD is fine.
>
> yes seriously. what's wrong with XML DTDs?
Nothing, as long as you're using it to refer to the current syntax of a DTD. If
it was used for the XML version, it would cause confusion differentiating between
an SGML DTD and an XML DTD, for instance.
> let's not coin a phrase for the sake of itself :-)
Why not? It's a proud tradition in the IT industry ... :-)
How about XROD (rendition of declarations)?
--
Regards
Marcus Carr email: mrc@a...
_______________________________________________________________
Allette Systems (Australia) email: info@a...
Level 10, 91 York Street www: http://www.allette.com.au
Sydney 2000 NSW Australia phone: +61 2 9262 4777
fax: +61 2 9262 4774
_______________________________________________________________
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
