Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Marcus Carr wrote: > Nothing, as long as you're using it to refer to the current syntax of a DTD. If > it was used for the XML version, it would cause confusion differentiating between > an SGML DTD and an XML DTD, for instance. Huh? XML DTDs ARE SGML DTDs. When XML Schemas are written in XML, they will be XML Schemas, yes? Am I confused? Or is this a confused issue? lisa > > > let's not coin a phrase for the sake of itself :-) > > Why not? It's a proud tradition in the IT industry ... :-) > > How about XROD (rendition of declarations)? > > -- > Regards > > Marcus Carr email: mrc@a... > _______________________________________________________________ > Allette Systems (Australia) email: info@a... > Level 10, 91 York Street www: http://www.allette.com.au > Sydney 2000 NSW Australia phone: +61 2 9262 4777 > fax: +61 2 9262 4774 > _______________________________________________________________ > > xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... > Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ > To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; > (un)subscribe xml-dev > To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; > subscribe xml-dev-digest > List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...) xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
