• From: Sean Mc Grath <digitome@i...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 16:02:35 GMT

[Paul Prescod]
>
>If a byte-for-byte entity transform (and not just a grove-identity
>transform) is a requirement, SAX-J would have to keep a whole pile of
>information about whitespace and perhaps other normalizations that I forget
>right now...
>

Yes. We need some way to express levels of "logical equivalence" between XML
docs.
An agreement on this would point the way to a list of what must and what
optionally may
be in SAX-⟨.

Sean Mc Grath
sean at digitome dot com




xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: SAX-J and the DPH (DJH?)
• Next by Date: Re: Still quizzing Microsoft on minimization
• Previous by thread: Re: SAX-J and the DPH (DJH?)
• Next by thread: Re: SAX-J and the DPH (DJH?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread