• From: Paul Prescod <papresco@t...>
• To: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>, <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 12:16:17 -0500 (EST)

At 01:51 PM 12/31/97 +1100, Rick Jelliffe wrote:
>> >Thanks for catching the error.  That copy is out-of-date.  I'll send a note
>> >to Dr. Gui and ask for it to be fixed.
>
>Why call this an error?  Why not just clearly label it as syntax which is
>not valid or WF XML, but can be allowed in SGML. 

Obviously it is an error in the context of an article on XML. If it were an
article on SGML, or SGML/XML, it would be correct.

 Paul Prescod


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: SAX-J and the DPH (DJH?)
• Next by Date: Re: Failure Criteria: Simple XML Event-Based API for Java
• Previous by thread: Re: Still quizzing Microsoft on minimization
• Next by thread: Dr GUI
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread