• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 23:54:20 -0800

At 09:03 PM 18/11/97 -0500, Jonathan Robie wrote:
>At 11:04 PM 11/18/97 +0000, Henry S. Thompson wrote:
>>Um, why doesn't XLL address all the goals of this thread and then
>>some?
>If I remember what I learned in high school rhetoric, I think the burden of
>proof is on the affirmative!

Let me rephrase Henry's comment: I suggest that those who are proposing
brave new query language worlds go have a look at XLL.  It *may* be the
case that XLL xpointers hit a good 80-20 point in terms of what we'd
like in a query language and in ease of implementation. -Tim

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Three Access Language Paradigms
    • From: Joe Lapp <jlapp@a...>
  • Re: Three Access Language Paradigms
    • From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Three Access Language Paradigms
• Next by Date: Re: Three Access Language Paradigms
• Previous by thread: Re: Three Access Language Paradigms
• Next by thread: Re: Three Access Language Paradigms
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread