• From: Joe Lapp <jlapp@a...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 09:48:13 -0500

Tim Bray <tbray@t...> wrote:
>Let me rephrase Henry's comment: I suggest that those who are proposing
>brave new query language worlds go have a look at XLL.  It *may* be the
>case that XLL xpointers hit a good 80-20 point in terms of what we'd
>like in a query language and in ease of implementation. -Tim

I assume that XLL is what the XML-LINK document describes.  If so, then
for starters, what sort of editing mechanisms does XLL have?
--
Joe Lapp (Java Apps Developer/Consultant)
Unite for Java! - http://www.javalobby.org
jlapp@a...

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Three Access Language Paradigms
    • From: Richard Light <richard@l...>

• References:
  • Re: Three Access Language Paradigms
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Data manipulation languages for XML (was Query Languages ...)
• Next by Date: msxml 1.6 : ID without DTD Declaration
• Previous by thread: Re: Three Access Language Paradigms
• Next by thread: Re: Three Access Language Paradigms
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread