I would convert the XSLT file so that the primary output is nothing, or
is negligible, and the secondary output becomes the point of focus. Use
<xsl:result-document> or file:write(), protecting those actions with the
appropriate condition-checking, and message writing. Under this approach
you do not and should not need to make the -s: and -o: parameters
identical on the command line. My two cents.
What is the proper way to deal with this problem? Is there a way to
instruct Saxon (I am using Saxon 9 HE) not to write an output when the
transformation fails? Or should the transformation be organized
differently?
Joel
--
Joel Kalvesmaki
http://textalign.net
|
Cart
