Paul Tyson wrote:

> Will your "metadata" output be further machine
> processed to prove the transformation integrity?

Ha! That is exactly what I am planning to do! I will do the mapping and verify
the mapping.

> Years ago when I was asked to verify my transform
> was correct, I wrote out a schematron result-document
> with rules stating what the output should look like.
> Then I ran the schematron rules against the XSLT output.
> In your case, you could tell schematron to report not
> only what was expected, but why.

Wow! This is terrific! I hadn't thought about generating Schematron as I
perform the mapping. Thank you!