Perhaps more importantly, I assume there is no way we can prevent
aforementioned hazard from using the XSLT-list as training data? Having made
some contributions I in no way wish those to be used/mangled by a glorified
deep pattern-matcher. Such a pity that knowledge-based programming didnbt
get really pushed much further in the early 90sb&

John Lumley
john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> On 7 Jul 2023, at 14:35, Dave Pawson dave.pawson@xxxxxxxxx
<xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Which begs the question, how might the xsl-list archives be ...
> declared / converted / made available (whatever) as training data?
>  And for this set (minor drawback), how to extract the 'eventual'
> solution from others proffered in error?