> In my abundant ignorance of the editorial process I assumed that at
> least each function (nd other component) of the language would have a
> few paras of explanation; but specifically would occupy something like
> a <sect*> to itself at some level, with the name of the function in
> the <title>, or perhaps as the xml:id.  It is then trivial to list
> them all, with a view to indexing, checking, assigning to
> subcommittees, etc. But perhaps I have been working with structured
> document systems for too long :-)

Thatbs certainly the case, therebs a lot of valuable information in the
markup that we can use to improve access to the specs.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

--
Norman Tovey-Walsh <ndw@xxxxxxxxxx>
https://nwalsh.com/

> Science is not a tradition, it is the organized use of evidence from
> the real world to make inferences about the real worldbmeaning the real
> universe, which is, in Carl Saganbs words, all that is, or ever was, or
> ever will be.--Richard Dawkins

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which had a name of signature.asc]