[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On 04.08.2022 21:59, Michael Kay mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Yes, need you to flesh outA good case for Invisible XML (topic of the week at Balisage), but I'll leave someone else to flesh it out. B on-no-match="shallow-copy-all" of https://balisage.net/Proceedings/vol27/html/Kay01/BalisageVol27-Kay01.html#d1 0153e637 instead, the paper says For arrays, it does <xsl:apply-templates select="array:parcels(.)" mode="#current"/> that is, it wraps each of the array members into a parcel and processes each one separately. For maps, it does: <xsl:apply-templates select="map:entries()" mode="#current"/>
Is <xsl:mode on-no-match="shallow-copy-all"/> behaviour definable with current or future XSLT elements?
|

Cart



