IMHO you should take everyonebs badviceb b& which means you should look
at them all and decide what works best for you b& in your environment b&
with you and your users b& and then make a decision based on your specific
requirements.

Of course that is my opinion (MHO).
I would never attempt to tell you what is best based on what I do and use.



Kevin Brown
RenderX



From: Christophe Marchand cmarchand@xxxxxxxxxx
<xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2022 3:13 AM
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re:  suggestion for an xml editor, please?



Right ! But the point here was EMacs is able to work on very large files, and
is a little bit easier than vi (according to some EMacs fans...) that as also
some XML extensions...

Christophe

Le 17/08/2022 C  12:05, Peter Flynn peter@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:peter@xxxxxxxxxxx>  a C)crit :

On 17 August 2022 09:51:25 "Christophe Marchand cmarchand@xxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:cmarchand@xxxxxxxxxx> "
<mailto:xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

[b&] For this kind of documents, prefer some simple text editors, like EMacs
or others that are able to work woth large files.



Not forgetting that Emacs has modes (packages) which make it a fully-fledged
XML editor. All open source.



Peter







XSL-List info and archive <http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list>

EasyUnsubscribe <http://lists.mulberrytech.com/unsub/xsl-list/2837134>  (by
email)

XSL-List info and archive <http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list>

EasyUnsubscribe <http://lists.mulberrytech.com/unsub/xsl-list/3183067>  (by
email <> )