"Eliot Kimber eliot.kimber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
<xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> I was looking in the XPath 3.1 functions and operators docbso I think
> my question still standsbwhy do I not find a definition of the
> intersect operator in the Functions and Operators spec?

I donbt know if therebs a good editorial reason, or if itbs simply a
matter of oversight. I donbt think it would have been unreasonable to
expect an bop:intersectb function described in F&O with a pointer from
the bintersectb operator in XPath to that function. But thatbs not the
way the XPath spec got written. B/\_(c)_/B/

> And also why does a google search not find the entry in the XPath
> spec?

According to a bit of spam that drifted past me today, Google/Alphabet
are engaged in a broad program of mind control over the entire human
race. Perhaps theybre distracted a bit from the search engine business.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

--
Norman Tovey-Walsh <ndw@xxxxxxxxxx>
https://nwalsh.com/

> Because things are the way they are, things will not stay the way they
> are.--Bertolt Brecht

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which had a name of signature.asc]